5
$\begingroup$

I understand that the radiation of a body can be described using the curve for black-body radiation. In the sense that a hotter body will be blue shifted and a cooler body will be red shifted.

The doppler effect gives similar results in the sense that a body is approaching us is blue shifted. While an object that is travelling away from us is red shifted.

How is it possible to distinguish between temperature and doppler effect?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I think you misunderstand something, or the way you describe is not correct. A blackbody has nothing to do with blue/red shifting. Or, if you are talking about a hotter blackbody has its peak at bluer wavelength, that is you are describing the peak, not the blue/red shift. $\endgroup$
    – Kornpob Bhirombhakdi
    Commented Jan 14, 2019 at 23:00
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @KornpobBhirombhakdi I don't think that's the point of this question. He wants to know if a red-shifted BB curve has any shape difference from a non-shifted BBcurve at a lower temperature. $\endgroup$
    – Carl Witthoft
    Commented Jan 15, 2019 at 20:16

3 Answers 3

Reset to default
7
$\begingroup$

Without any other information, you cannot distinguish between the two effects.

$$ T = T_0 (1 + z) $$

A blackbody spectrum of temperature $T$ is identical to a blackbody spectrum of temperature $T_0$ with redshift $z$.

For stellar/galactic radiation, we can use the fact that the radiation is not a perfect blackbody. For the CMB, we can use the fact that atomic combination happens only below a particular temperature.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

If the object you're observing is something good and hot, like a star, it's pretty easy to identify a set of Ballmer lines by the relative spacing between the lines. Then compare the absolute wavelengths to the known stationary values and viola you've got the Doppler shift value.

So this would "technically" be using the blackbody radiation from the photosphere of a star to illuminate its cooler atmosphere above, making its dark absorption lines visible.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I've added a sentence to make sure this addresses the OP's question about "...using Black-body radiation?" $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Jan 16, 2019 at 6:06
-1
$\begingroup$

How is it possible to distinguish between temperature and doppler effect?

The blackbody curve varies in both peak and shape:

enter image description here

As you can see, even if you slide the curves left or right, the 5000k curve is still different than the 3000k one. The peak is at a different point relative to the curve as a whole, and especially the extinction point in the ultraviolet (around 0.2 um in this case).

At a minimum, you could compare the position of the peak to the extinction point and produce a temperature. In this example, blue has a span of about 0.3, while red is about 0.5.

So using the numbers in this example, if you were given a spectrum and measured a span of 0.3, you know it's blue. So if the peak of the curve is at 0.8 instead of 0.6 you would ascribe that to 0.2 um of doppler shifting (or other shifting effects).

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ the question isn't well written, but it seems that it's asking about how to differentiate a change in temperature from a change in velocity. For example, if the peak wavelength of the Planck distribution increases by 1% we can't tell if the object became 1% cooler, or started to move at 1% the speed of light away from us. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Sep 18, 2019 at 14:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This isn't correct. A red-shifted blackbody curve just looks like a cooler blackbody. e.g. the CMB. $\endgroup$
    – ProfRob
    Commented Sep 18, 2019 at 15:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .