1
$\begingroup$

How do we calculate the mass of the universe taking into consideration dark matter? Mass of visible matter can be computed by stellar method, but how do we calculate mass of dark matter which we don't see? Why do we assume that dark matter is more abundant than visible matter?

$\endgroup$

bumped to the homepage by Community 2 days ago

This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ The are many ways to determine the density of dark matter, from which the total mass of some volume can be calculated. Did you read the Wikipedia article on dark matter? $\endgroup$ – pela Feb 17 at 20:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It’s a mistake to think most baryonic matter is in stars. It’s probably less than 10%. $\endgroup$ – Chappo Feb 17 at 21:39
-1
$\begingroup$

Check out the Wikipedia page on the missing baryon problem. It's how we compute the mass of ordinary matter. You can see there are methods of getting the mass of ordinary matter without adding them up. In other words, you can find ordinary matter even if they're invisible.

This is similar to how we find dark matter. Again, look at Wikipedia's article on dark matter, in particular the observational evidence section. Ignore the more technical methods if you're new to the field and just look at the first few:

  • With galaxy rotation curves, you know you need more matter to recover Kepler's laws. How much matter? You can tweak that number and therefore get an estimate for the dark matter needed. You can't prove that this dark matter isn't just invisible ordinary matter using this method, however.
  • The same goes for velocity dispersions.
  • Gravitational lensing can measure the total mass of an intervening cluster without knowing anything about the kinematics of the cluster.

If you're wondering how we know dark matter can't just be invisible ordinary matter, again look at the Wikipedia article, in particular this section.

  • Big bang nucleosynthesis constrains the amount of ordinary matter in the universe. If dark matter were just invisible ordinary matter, we also expect more helium, lithium, etc in the universe than we observe.
  • Gravitational microlensing constrains the amount of MACHOs (massive compact halo objects, such as black holes and invisible planets) we can have in a large mass range, covering most of the plausible candidates.
  • Data from the cosmic microwave background indicates a large fraction of matter does not react with photons.
$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Hi Allure, I like your description about dark matter, but I think perhaps you've misunderstood what the "missing baryon problem" is about. That problem isn't really related to calculating the mass of baryons, but to the fact that we didn't find, observationally, ~1/3 of the baryons that we "knew" were supposed to be there. It's considered largely solved now, with the missing baryons probably existing as warm/hot gas, which is difficult to probe observationally. $\endgroup$ – pela Feb 18 at 9:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @pela That's not what I was aiming at. The point is that the page (in particular the observations section) details how mass of ordinary matter is calculated. $\endgroup$ – Allure yesterday
  • $\begingroup$ Okay sorry, then I misunderstood. $\endgroup$ – pela yesterday

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.