This page lists the total luminosity of the Milky Way Galaxy to be $4\times10^{10}$ $L_{sol}$, and $L_{sol}=3.86 \times10^{33}$ ergs.sec$^{-1}$; this gives a total luminosity for the MW of $1.54\times10^{44}$ ergs.sec$^{-1}$.

But Seyfert galaxies can have luminosities of $\sim 10^{40} - 10^{42}$ ergs.sec$^{-1}$, and this is due to the high luminosity of the galactic core of a Seyfert.

Since the MW doesn't have an active SMBH, does this mean that the MW is particularly bright due to a high luminosity stellar population? Or am I missing something?

  • $\begingroup$ Seyferts can easily be as or more luminous than the Milky Way. $\endgroup$ – ProfRob Apr 9 '19 at 7:20
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, I know, and that's my point; shouldn't the MW be less luminous than Seyferts? Sorry if I didn't make that clear. $\endgroup$ – Jim421616 Apr 9 '19 at 10:09
  • $\begingroup$ So what you may have missed is a reliable source of Seyfert luminosities, since I don't recognise your range. $\endgroup$ – ProfRob Apr 9 '19 at 12:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.