2
$\begingroup$

This Wikipedia page contains information about the star Spica in the rightmost table. A small snapshot of this table is below.

table data

In this table, the absolute magnitude is given as −3.55 (−3.5/−1.5). Instead of seeing the value and error given as value ± error, I am thinking the error is given as it is because of absolute magnitude is given on a logarithmic scale (as opposed to linear scale). But I am not quite sure how to interpret this as an error reading. How does one interpret this reading?

|improve this question
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Spica (α Vir) is a binary star. The Wikipedia article cites Herbison-Evans et al. 1971, whose Table III says:

Absolute magnitude of primary (Mv1)   -3.5±0.1
Absolute magnitude of secondary (Mv2)   -1.5±0.2

So the confusing "-3.55 (-3.5 / -1.5)" can be interpreted as "combined (primary / secondary)."

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.