This summer, I was working on a project fitting very high energy gamma ray spectra of the Crab Nebula, a pulsar wind nebula. At energies about $\sim$1 TeV, a simple power law suffices, i.e. $\phi(E)\propto E^{\alpha}$. Most power law models of the Crab find a spectral index of $\alpha\simeq-2.47$ (e.g. Hillas 1998, $\alpha=-2.49\pm0.06$). Using a normal analysis method on one dataset, I found $\alpha=-2.469\pm0.02248$, which matches the literature values quite well.

Using the modified analysis method I was testing, however, I found $\alpha=-2.316\pm0.02040$. We believe that method is a poor choice because I showed the calculated flux values were incompatible with previous observations. The spectral index also cast doubts on its viability. However, I was wondering if, for a random pulsar wind nebula, a slightly harder spectral index like $\alpha=-2.316$ is unphysical, or reasonable.

Therefore, I'm wondering: What is the distribution of spectral indices for power-law models of very high energy spectra of pulsar wind nebulae? Do we have a large enough population of pulsar wind nebulae that we can determine what a typical value for $\alpha$ is, and what range we would expect a spectral index to fall into? In other words, could if I had obtained a certain value for $\alpha$, what value would it need to have for me to reject the result as unphysical?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.