9
$\begingroup$

On Earth, high pressures and low pressures occur interchangeably. So that where two pressure systems intersect, they move the air in the same direction. But as Juno revealed the first observations of Jupiter's north pole, that doesn't seem to be the case over there. There are eight gigantic storms surrounding a ninth one, and they all move counter clockwise. With two smaller ones in between on one side that do move clockwise.

How can this be explained? How is this possible?

enter image description here

JPL Juno IR image of Jupiter's north pole

$\endgroup$
4
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Of course its possible: The countervortices have probably simply been advected away. Or a different instability is responsible for this than on Earth. There is no detailed and successful modeling of this yet though, so I don't think anybody can explain it well yet. $\endgroup$ Sep 23 '19 at 12:51
  • $\begingroup$ @AtmosphericPrisonEscape Of course it is what it is, but how? The term "advection" seems to refer to HORIZONTAL movements, such as the horizontal dispersion of heat. But doesn't the collision of gas in co-rotating cyklons instead cause friction and heat? I would've guessed that perhaps enormous VERTICAL flows from a deep unknown interior would be required to dominate this anti-meteorological surface phenomena. $\endgroup$
    – LocalFluff
    Sep 23 '19 at 18:04
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I just said, nobody has a good model yet. So we don't know how. One can speculate much and say it should have been A or it should have been B, but unless those scenarios are tested in a 3D global circulation model, nobody will know for sure. Advection is the transport of some quantity along with the flow. Can be in any direction. But atmospheres are stratified, so horizontal advection usually dominates the vertical one. Compression and stresses cause heat, yes. Collision of gas particles is encoded in the temperature. $\endgroup$ Sep 24 '19 at 10:44
  • $\begingroup$ Vertical flows: Maybe those play a role, but again, stratification would play against that, and we don't understand how Jupiters poles would have unstable stratification. Also how would material coming (maybe convecting?) from the deep suddenly gain angular momentum and form vortices? To your last point: It's certainly not "anti-meteorological". Meteorology is physics, and eveything is physics. This is just poorly understood meteorology, not magic. $\endgroup$ Sep 24 '19 at 10:47
3
$\begingroup$

Let my try to stretch the analogy to anticyclonic tornados: The vast majority of all tornados move cyclonic, i.e. counterclockwise on the Northern Hemnisphere of our blue planet. There is e.g. a publication on anticyclonic tornados by Howard Bluestein et. al. which says:

It is also possible that the source of vorticity in the anticyclonic tornadoes is not from a parent mesoanticyclone (produced via tilting), but rather from (hypothesis 2) preexisting anticyclonic shear vorticity on the anticyclonic-shear side of the low-level jet associated with the rear-flank downdraft [...]

In simple words: It is not fully clear yet, how exactly these atypical atmospheric vortices form, but there are different possible explanations why tornados exist which rotate against the direction supported by Coriolis force. This reminds me somehow of the Coriolis Force Effect on Drains:

The notion that the Coriolis force determines which direction water spirals down drains is one of the most prominent scientific myths.

Some educational German television show has been able to actively influence the rotation of water spiraling down a drain with appropriate boundary conditions like little wings in the drain (but the clip is not online). In the metereology of planets with solid surface, the effect of the ground on the atmospheric motion is usually termed orographic effect. I suppose the different rotations of the Juno IR image of Jupiter's north pole have similiar "guide wings" in the lower atmosphere, most probably density fluctuations.

Another important factor is that eddies in fluids live really long, plus these eddies can interact with each other. I remember listening to a scientific talk on some kind of "algebra of eddies", but I did not manage to figure out the reference. However, a similar idea can be found within the references of a preprint on the network of solar flares. The idea of this kind of meta-modelling of Navier-Stokes equation is to save computer-time and nevertheless predict eddy dynamics. What that means for your questions: It is not too unprobable that a single anticyclonic eddy formed, and due its interactions with the other eddies in the storm system, other anticyclonic eddies could have been branched of this one. Let me conclude with the words of @AtmosphericPrisonEscape

One can speculate much and say it should have been A or it should have been B, but unless those scenarios are tested in a 3D global circulation model, nobody will know for sure.

Related

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.