We know that the Moon's gravity is about one-sixth that of Earth. Then I recently read that the mass of the Moon is about one-eightieth the mass of Earth. Since gravity depends on the mass of the 2 objects, shouldn't the Moon's gravity be one-eightieth the gravity of Earth? Is the Moon extra dense?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The moon being made from other stuff than the Earth probably factors into this. A lot fewer liquids there. $\endgroup$ Dec 12, 2019 at 15:59
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ Do you know the formula for determining the gravitational force between two masses? $\endgroup$ Dec 12, 2019 at 18:08
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Alchemista: If the Moon had its current mass but was the size of the Earth -- and was therefore enormously less dense -- then it would have 1/80th of the surface gravity. But the Moon is not the size of the Earth, and that matters. I asked if the original poster knew the formula as a nudge towards thinking about the fact that the distance between centers of the masses is just as important a factor as the masses. $\endgroup$ Dec 13, 2019 at 13:43
  • $\begingroup$ I get it. If the Moon had its same mass, but with a radius the same as Earth, then the surface gravity would be 1/80th. The distances would correspond, and mass would be the only variable. The Moon's smaller radius from center to surface gives us the 1/6 instead of 1/80th. No wonder it's so hard to split an atom. $\endgroup$
    – John Canon
    Dec 14, 2019 at 2:26
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @JohnCanon: The difficulty of splitting an atom is not due to the gravitational force holding it together, but that belongs on physics.se Gravity is truly negligible at that scale. $\endgroup$ Dec 14, 2019 at 4:43

1 Answer 1


As you said, the mass of the Moon is 1.2 percent that of the Earth. Now, if you mean the gravitational acceleration at the surface, it is calculated like this $G\frac{M}{R^2}$, where $M$ is the mass, and $R$ is the radius of the celestial body. The moon's mass is a hundred times smaller, but the radius is four times smaller, meaning its surface gravity will be $100/16 \approx 6$ times smaller. Considering the factor is mass over radius to the power of two here, density alone does not help you determine the ratio of surface accelerations.
On a side note, the moon's density is around 60 per cent that of the Earth.

  • 9
    $\begingroup$ ... and that 60% density value should derive directly from knowledge of the radius and gravitational force at that radius :-) $\endgroup$ Dec 12, 2019 at 16:36
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Low density because Theia drops most of its iron core onto proto-Earth at collision time. Still the 2nd densest moon in the solar system; only Io is denser $\endgroup$ Dec 12, 2019 at 22:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DavidTonhofer that must mean Io is worth more, since it has a higher metal content. How do we go about trading? $\endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Dec 14, 2019 at 5:26
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @corsiKa That's easy. I give you \$10 for a bit of the Moon and you give me \$50 for the same amount of Io. $\endgroup$ Dec 14, 2019 at 12:06

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .