2
$\begingroup$
  1. How different would space have been if there was no dark matter?

  2. Can space be considered vacuum even when occupied with abundant dark matter?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is really two different questions. $\endgroup$ – usernumber Jan 13 at 10:48
5
$\begingroup$

Non-baryonic dark matter (ie dark matter made of some particle that doesn't interact with light) had an important role in forming the large scale structure of the universe. The early universe was dominated by light radiation, and this would have prevented the early clumps of matter from growing. But dark matter isn't affected by radiation, so it can form clumps, which then attracts the normal matter towards it. Without dark matter, galaxies wouldn't have been able to form. You can read about structure formation on Wikipedia.

The second question is just about definitions. Generally, when we talk about a "vacuum" we mean a space with few molecules of gas or other atoms. This is because other particles, such as photons or dark matter particles don't contribute to pressure. A vacuum is a place with a very low pressure, not necessarily a place with no particles at all. So you can talk about a vacuum without needing to make a fuss over dark matter. However the actual density of dark matter is still very low: about the same as one hydrogen atom for every 3cm³. Even in the best vacuums that we can create on Earth, and even in interplanetary space, regular matter dominates.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for helping me out! $\endgroup$ – Shreya Soni Jan 14 at 4:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.