2
$\begingroup$

This answer to Did comets 266P/Christensen or P/2008 Y2 (Gibbs) cause the Wow! signal? points out that the comets in question were nowhere near where the radio telescope was pointed.

Wikipedia says that the Ohio State University Radio Observatory (or Big Ear) was a Kraus-type radio telescope but doesn't provide enough information to deduce a field of view.

Questions:

  1. What was the field of view of the Ohio State University Radio Observatory of Wow! signal fame?
  2. What would be the typical rise and fall times of a steady source passing through the fixed telescope's field of view as the Earth rotated?
$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

For a single dish radio telescope we define the primary beam as the telescope's response on the sky as a function of angle. What this means is that half way between the centre and edge of the primary beam, a radio source with a flux of 1 Jy will be observed to have a flux of 0.5 Jy. This response is circular i.e. it is a function of angular separation, and is not dependent on altitude/azimuth. The full-width of this response is typically written as:

Primary beam width

where Primary beam width are the primary beam width in radians, observing wavelength and dish diameter.

As for the big ear telescope, it is obviously not a parabolic reflector or Gregorian offset like the Lovell or Greenbank telescopes (www.naapo.org/W8JK/Images/JDK097l.jpg). Since the secondary reflector is the important one in the determination of resolution, we shall use its dimensions, which are 103m long by 21m high.

The Wow! signal was received at 1420MHz which has a wavelength of 0.21m. Using the above equation, the response would not be circular, but 'fan-shaped'. The response would thereby have approximate dimensions on the sky of 0.12deg by 0.58deg (in azimuth and altitude respectively).

Caveats of this calculation are the non-circular reflectors, which means the actual shape of the telescope's response on the sky would not be Gaussian/symmetrical for that matter. But as for an approximate, angular resolution, 0.12deg by 0.58deg will suffice.

Further to this, if you can find the LST (local sidereal time) of when the Wow! signal was received, and assuming that the big ear telescope is pointing at the zenith (i.e. straight up), the spot the telescope was pointing to would be easy enough to derive based upon telescope latitude and LST. Enjoy!

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer! Yep, if we had to use a simple model and assume the source was on the meridian at the time, then maybe a single-slit diffraction pattern is a pretty good approximation, and as you point out, better than an Airy disk for this antenna. If we knew the declination that it was pointed at, then the angular full width resolution could be compared to the 72 seconds (duration in time) mentioned in the other answer. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Sep 24 at 14:52
  • $\begingroup$ btw are 0.12 and 058 degrees switched? I'd expect azimuth to have a narrower beam than altitude, since the aperture was a lot longer than it was tall. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Sep 24 at 14:54
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, yes, I switched them by accident. Editing my answer to correct. $\endgroup$ – simonp2207 Sep 24 at 15:59
  • $\begingroup$ With regards to where the telescope was pointing... I'm guessing with the fixed receiver building, only small adjustments in RA/Dec were possible, if at all. I wouldn't be surprised if the technology of the time simply used earth rotation alone to change the pointing centre of the telescope. $\endgroup$ – simonp2207 Sep 24 at 16:02
  • $\begingroup$ The flat reflector tilts to adjust the elevation (declination, if you are an astronomer) of the beam. It can be pointed up and down to different places along the local meridian. There's a little more here (mentioned here) $\endgroup$ – uhoh Sep 24 at 17:01
0
$\begingroup$

@uhoh, I hope this answers your first question.

I sourced the following 2 paragraphs from an NBC article by Jesse Emspak, "Has Mysterious Signal From Space Finally Been Explained?":

Two big issues are that the signal didn't repeat, and it appeared for such a short time. Ehman noted that the Big Ear telescope had two "feed horns," each of which provides a slightly different field of view for a radio telescope.

"We should have seen the source come through twice in about 3 minutes: one response lasting 72 seconds and a second response for 72 seconds following within about a minute and a half," Ehman told Live Science. "We didn't see the second one."

The first para clearly states that the 'Big Ear' had no single field of view. I also tried to search for this in many ways, but with no luck, the telescope has also been disassembled.

For your second question though, it requires some thinking as the 2 'feed horns' of the telescope give slightly different field of views. I don't know the answer to this yet, but I will attempt to find it.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm... interesting, thanks! Well 72 seconds would be 0.3 degrees if the telescope were pointed towards the celestial equator (assume 360 degrees in 24 hours) and you can multiply that by the cosine of the declination, so I think you are almost there! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Sep 13 at 8:12
  • $\begingroup$ @uhoh, I haven't really ventured deep into Astronomical Math, but thanks for the info! $\endgroup$ – AyushBhatt Sep 13 at 8:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.