1
$\begingroup$

I was looking at the visualization tools of Gaia, and tried plotting a color-magnitude diagram. On the right hand side of the image, photGMeanMag (mag) (the amount of light) is plotted as a function of BpRp (mag) (the color).

enter image description here

I was surprised by the distribution of the points in the plot, since I was expecting to see something like the main sequence of the HR diagram, like in this plot:

enter image description here

Why are the points distributed in a sort of wedge, rather than along a diagonal line?

| improve this question | |
$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Is the value on the vertical axis absolute or apparent magnitude? $\endgroup$ – antispinwards Feb 26 at 8:16
  • $\begingroup$ Excellent question. That is possibly the problem. I shall investigate. $\endgroup$ – usernumber Feb 26 at 8:33
2
$\begingroup$

The diagram you've plotted is a color-magnitude diagram, and the magnitude it plots is the apparent magnitude.

If you click the Plot2D button and select the plot type, under "Astrophysical parameters" you will find "GDR2 HR diagram". This produces a plot that looks like this:

enter image description here

This is probably somewhat closer to what you are expecting. It isn't the same shape as the HR diagrams in the question because its missing hot stars and cooler objects. As noted in the Gaia DR2 contents page:

Subject to limitations (see below) the effective temperatures Teff for more than 161 million sources brighter than 17th magnitude with effective temperatures in the range 3000 to 10,000 K.

The limitations section goes on to state:

The values of Teff, extinction AG, reddening E(GBP-GRP), radius, and luminosity were determined only from the three broad-band photometric measurements and the parallax on a star-by-star basis (parallax was not used for Teff though). The strong degeneracy between Teff and extinction/reddening when using the broad band photometry necessitates strong assumptions in order to estimate their values. One should thus be very careful in using these astrophysical parameters and refer to the papers and online documentation for guidance.

(emphasis mine)

I haven't seen a way to set custom axes, it looks like you can only create the predefined plots, so it doesn't look like you can do absolute G magnitude against GBP-GRP.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Try plotting absolute G magnitude (i.e. corrected for the fact tthat all the stars are at different distances) on the y-axis.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.