0
$\begingroup$

This answer makes the assumption that the ratio between the radius of a planet and the radius of its core is roughly constant shortly after planetary formation. Why should this be the case? Do we know why, when a planet forms, it ends up with half of its radius being core?

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Isn't this just based on assuming the same mix of heavy core-forming elements and lighter mantle/crust forming elements? Take any mass of the mix, turn it into a sphere and have a core form, and the ratio should be the same. $\endgroup$ – Anders Sandberg Mar 24 at 9:52
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I don't think your linked question/answer makes that assumption for any other than the smaller , inner planets in our system. $\endgroup$ – Carl Witthoft Mar 24 at 17:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.