1
$\begingroup$

I want to know the average distance between Io and Europa knowing that Io's semi-major axis (around Jupiter of course) is 421,800 km and Europa's semi-major axis is 671,100 km.

At first I thought it's the average of the closest approach (671,100 - 421,800 = 249,300 km) and the farthest approach (671,100 + 421,800 = 1,092,000 km), but the average of those is exactly 671,100 km, which is Europa's semi-major axis, and I find that hard to believe.

Assuming the orbits are co-planar and perfectly circular, which they more or less are, surely there must be a simple formula to calculate the average distance?

I asked this on another site and the answer was "run a simulation!", which is a very good answer, and I would've already done that if I knew how lol.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

If we set the radius of Io's orbit to 1, then Europa's is about $a=$1.591. Since they are in a 2:1 orbital resonance we would expect that number to the 3/2 power to be exactly 2. It's close (2.007) but there's enough of a difference to make it interesting; since Jupiter rotates rapidly I'm guessing that it's related to this.

Okay based on @JamesK's idea of keeping one fixed I tried to get the analytical integral

$$<r_{12}> = \frac{1}{2 \pi}\int_0^{2 \pi}\sqrt{(a-\cos \theta)^2 + \sin^2 \theta} \ d\theta$$

from Wolfram Alpha but I got a

Standard computation time exceeded...

message which I've never seen before, (screenshot) so I did it in Python.

While @JamesK's answer is "the greater of the two" which here would be 1.591 or there would be 671,100 kilometers, because this is a 2D and not a 1D problem and Pythagoras has something to say, I get a different value.

('ratio: ', 1.5910384068278804)
('d.mean(): ', 1.7524934914237922)
('James_K: ', 1.5910384068278804)

The Python script below returns 1.752 or about 739,200 kilometers (solid line) versus the mean projected 1 dimensional distance (dashed line).

enter image description here

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

a = 671100. / 421800
print('ratio: ', a)

theta = np.linspace(0, 2*np.pi, 100001)[::-1] # don't double-count the endpoints
d = np.sqrt((a - np.cos(theta))**2 + np.sin(theta)**2)
print('d.mean(): ', d.mean())
theta_degs = (180/np.pi) * theta

plt.plot(theta_degs, d)
plt.xlabel('phase angle (deg)')
plt.ylabel("distance normalized to Io's SMA")
plt.plot(theta_degs, d.mean() * np.ones_like(theta_degs), '-k')
plt.plot(theta_degs, a * np.ones_like(theta_degs), '--k')
plt.ylim(0, None)
plt.show()

James_K = ((a-1.) + (a+1.)) / 2.
print('James_K: ', James_K)
| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, this is right. I knew I should have done an integral. Taking average doesn't commute with finding magnitudes. $\endgroup$ – James K Jul 17 at 6:57
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, I'm not sure why finding an answer for such a simple question proved so hard. $\endgroup$ – user267545 Jul 17 at 7:15
  • $\begingroup$ @user267545 This is why I like Stack Exchange so much! :-) As long as something can be formulated clearly as you have done so nicely, it's not guaranteed, but pretty common to get helpful answers! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jul 17 at 8:11
0
$\begingroup$

There is no magic in your calculation: If the orbital radii are $a$ and $b$ and $a>b$ then

$$\frac{(a-b)+(a+b)}{2} = a$$

so the average of these two values is always equal to the greater of the two.

Now to think about this, imagine that Europa is fixed (ie we rotate the frame of reference to keep Europa at a fixed point. Io continues to move in a circle (in this approximation) centred at Jupiter. The average position of Io is in the centre of the circle. So the average vector from Europa to Io is the radius vector. As uhoh notes this doesn't mean that the average distance is 6721000, (taking averages doesn't commute with calculating magnitudes), and the average distance would require the evaluation of an integral. Uhoh has evaluated that integral.

To see a simulation, https://www.geogebra.org/classic/vemkse4k

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So, to be clear, my conclusion was right and I just came it to via the wrong path? So the average distance between any 2 Galilean moons is just the outer one's semi-major axis? $\endgroup$ – user267545 Jul 17 at 3:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, because I stopped thinking when the maths started to get hard. See other answer. $\endgroup$ – James K Jul 17 at 6:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.