2
$\begingroup$

I need to develop an Machine Learning (ML) model for predicting constellation seen in a picture taken from a mobile. This I need to develop from scratch. Firstly, I need help finding a database which can provide me images of stars with constellations labelled in it. Those can be from a ground based telescope or from a camera. This is going to be a multi-labelled problem. Even after spending hours of searching I can't find a good dataset. I want a dataset with several images (preferably a few 100), each labelled with the constellation seen in them. Then I am planning to refine them and use TensorFlow for prediction. I am a grade 12 student and still new to ML, so I really need your help.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

If actual photographs are not required, Stellarium could render a suitable set of reference images. Use the Perspective (gnomonic) projection for the closest match to a photograph, and display only the features you want. Its scripting capability may help you avoid repeating some manual operations.

Here are a sample pair of Stellarium images. The first has only synthetic stars, which the online plate-solving service Astrometry.net successfully recognizes:

18h+0, stars only

The second is the same part of the sky with only constellation labels and boundaries:

18h+0, constellations

The unlabeled region between Ophiuchus and Scutum is Serpens Cauda, part of the only discontinuous one of the 88 standard constellations.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This could be a good method but can you tell how can I render good enough resolution pictures from Stellarium especially if pictures are needed in bulk $\endgroup$ – Harsh Banka Aug 16 at 5:34
  • $\begingroup$ @HarshBanka you haven't really explained what "good enough resolution" means. brightness: Do you need deep sky survey images that can see way farther and dimmer than humans and cellphones, or only images that reflect what people and hand-held cameras are likely to pick up? resolution: Do you need super high resolution images through telescopes, or only images of similar angular resolution to what people and hand-held cameras can achieve? Is it possible to clarify those things back in your original question, rather than in comments only? Thanks! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Aug 16 at 19:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.