That the moon’s gravitational pull is responsible for the tides is established. However, if we want to detect the moon’s gravitational pull on earth, this is very challenging. This seems to be a paradox considering the enormous force needed to drive the tide.

  • $\begingroup$ +1 for a a great question! It's quite possible that someone will answer and provide a way to make such a laboratory measurement, though one has to account for the laboratory's rotation around the center of the Earth and about the Earth-Moon center of mass. If you think about it, the Moon's gravitational pull on Earth" is quite strong, it's just the difference between it's pull on the Earth and it's pull on an object in the laboratory is small and hard to measure. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Sep 29, 2020 at 4:24
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @uhoh - It's the difference between the Moon's gravitational acceleration of the Earth as a whole and Moon's gravitational acceleration on a patch of water on the surface of the Earth that drives the oceanic tides. Even worse, it's just the horizontal component of this acceleration vector that drives the tides. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 1, 2020 at 12:24
  • $\begingroup$ It's also the difference between measuring a constant value and measuring a delta. What you're really asking, I think, is how to measure the delta-g force in one location as the Earth rotates under the moon. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 1, 2020 at 15:18

2 Answers 2


Gravity is an acceleration, and force = mass x acceleration. Thus, if we want to detect the Moon's gravitational pull, we need either a giant mass or a really precise instrument. Since the oceans are a giant mass, the force on the ocean is thus correspondingly large. The fluidness of the ocean also allows it to move, even if the force per volume is small.

To expand on this, the tidal acceleration due to the Moon on the surface of the Earth is about 1 μm/s$^2$ (1), which means that the force due to the weight of a 1000 kg object will vary by about 0.001 N over the course of a day. 1000 kg of water is about 1 cubic meter, so every cubic meter of the ocean experiences that tiny variation in force as well. Since the ocean has about 1.3 x 10$^{18}$ cubic meters (2) of water in it, you could say the tidal force is 1.4 x 10$^{15}$ N, which is an absolutely enormous force - translated into weight, it's more than the weight of all living things on the Earth (3).

There is also a corresponding acceleration from the Sun, about half as strong as the Moon, which also has some effect on the tides, resulting in a monthly very high and very low tide, known as the spring tide, and a somewhat averaged tide, known as the neap tide. It might also help to realize that this 1/2 as strong force is what is also responsible for keeping the whole Earth in orbit around the Sun.


While gravity itself is weak relative to the other three known fundamental forces, that should not be construed to mean that the moon's gravitational pull on earth is necessarily weak. To say something is "weak," you really need some sort of benchmark against which to make that determination (e.g., I'm weak because I can only benchpress 50 kg, compared with my friend who can benchpress 100 kg, but I'm not weak relative to my other friend who can only benchpress 20 kg).

That aside, it helps to realize what gives rise (ha!) to a tidal force: Tidal force is the difference in gravitational pull from one side of an object to another. As opposed to gravity itself which is just the generic pull.

Think of it this way: I'm traveling in a car, in the back seat, and I really don't know how fast I'm going. I would need specialized equipment to do that, like a speedometer. But, I can certainly tell you that I'm traveling faster than a car I pass, or that a car that passes me is traveling faster than I am. So it's easier to measure that difference. (This isn't a perfect analogy, but the point is to illustrate measuring something from a reference frame you are in versus the difference between reference frames.)

Taking this to tides between Earth and Moon, it might be difficult to get an absolute gravitational measurement from the Moon at any given laboratory location on Earth. You're in the presence of Earth's much more dominating gravitational field. But, very roughly speaking, the side of Earth closest to the moon is about 109 lunar diameters away. The side of Earth farthest from the moon is about 113 lunar diameters away.

That difference is not trivial. The part of Earth closest to the moon is pulled more towards it than the part of Earth farthest from it, and the center of Earth is pulled towards the moon a "medium" amount. Since water is much more easily deformed than rock, we see this effect as tides in the oceans: The water facing the moon is pulled towards it (high tide), Earth is pulled towards the moon a little less, and the water facing away, on the other side of the planet, is pulled even less and so, conceptually, it lags behind in space, creating another high tide.

To FAKE put in numbers, the water closest to the Moon would be pulled 100 m towards the moon, the rocky part of Earth 50 m towards the Moon, and the water farthest from the Moon only 10 m towards the Moon, meaning that for people on the far side of Earth, the water appears to rise away from them. Again, those are not the real numbers, the point is to convey what's going on conceptually.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .