10
$\begingroup$

The following text is from here:

The Jovian planets get their heat from the Sun and from their interiors. Jupiter creates a lot of internal heat and releases this heat by emitting thermal radiation. In fact, Jupiter creates so much internal heat that it emits almost twice as much energy as it receives from the Sun. The only reasonable explanation is that Jupiter is still slowly contracting, almost as though it has not quite finished forming.

Saturn and Neptune also appear to be emitting more energy than they receive from the Sun. While we are certain Saturn is not still contracting, it seems clear that Neptune is still contracting. Uranus is the only jovian planet not emitting excess internal energy.

It make sense that the gas giants were formed from the force of gravity i.e. clouds of gas and dust particles contracted under their own weight, eventually becoming planetary bodies with solid core and gaseous atmospheres. For bodies whose bulk is mostly gas, it will contract towards its center and during such process, it will releases stored gravitational energy which will eventually convert into heat energy. Saturn is also a gaseous planet with rich gaseous atmosphere, so in theory, it should also contract under its own weight towards the center. So, why is it considered to have stopped contracting?

It is written here that Saturn has a different process for this internal heat formation because astronomers believe that unlike Jupiter, Saturn's formation process is complete and so, the heat energy is due to the falling of helium from clouds. Now, luminosity of planet (total power emitted by a spherical body) comes from the release of potential energy due to the gravitational contraction.

$${U = -\frac{GM^2}{R}}$$ $${L = \frac{dU}{dt} = \frac{GM^2}{R^2} \frac{dR}{dt}}$$ $${\frac{dR}{dt} = \frac{LR^2}{GM^2}}$$

Since, all the terms has non-zero value, there should be a non-zero value for the differential, even for Saturn implying that Saturn should contract with time. So, why astronomers believe Saturn's formation process to be complete (implying no further gravitational contraction)?

Related on physics.SE: What keeps a gas giant from falling in on itself?

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Your second link gives a security risk warning on Firefox ( Error code: SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN ). Ignore these at your peril. $\endgroup$
    – StephenG
    Nov 1 '20 at 1:29
  • $\begingroup$ @StephenG It is working fine for me. Anyways, I have included the relevant information from the link. $\endgroup$ Nov 1 '20 at 4:55
  • $\begingroup$ It is assumed that Saturn doesn't have a solid core at all, unlike the other gas planets. So Saturn seems to be purely gaseous (respectively supercritical in its deeper layers). $\endgroup$
    – John
    Nov 1 '20 at 9:55
  • $\begingroup$ Note that the domain of your second link (seattlepi.com) also region blocks (error 451). I'm in Ireland so the link may only be visible to North Americans, and may be the reason it gives a certificate warning on Firefox. $\endgroup$
    – StephenG
    Nov 1 '20 at 11:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As I mentioned here gravitational data from the Juno mission changed our picture of Jupiter's core. It seems that it's diffuse rather than compact, extending fuzzily to almost half the planet's radius. $\endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Nov 1 '20 at 22:51
8
$\begingroup$

The rate at which a planet contracts is determined by how much heat it can radiate from its surface and how close it is to the minimum radius allowed by electron degeneracy pressure (which is independent of temperature).

The contraction process is that heat radiates from the surface and is supplied by gravitational energy released by contraction. The process stops when the central pressure becomes determined by electron degeneracy at high densities. At this point the interior pressure decouples from the temperature (unlike a perfect gas) and the planet can cool at almost constant radius. The same process occurs in white dwarfs and brown dwarfs.

To first order, the radii of Jupiter and Saturn are similar and they have similar atmospheric compositions, so can radiate heat at a similar rate. But Saturn has far less gravitational potential energy to radiate and its centre reaches degenerate conditions earlier. In your equations you can see that $dR/dt \propto M^{-2}$ so Saturn contracts faster.

The equations you write down are essentially correct, but your statement that the terms are all non-zero is not. Effectively, Saturn is not luminous because of contraction, so $L \sim 0$ in these equations, and so is $dR/dt$ . The measured luminosity of Saturn instead comes from the residual heat in its interior and the chemical differentiation of helium and not through gravitational contraction.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Since luminosity of Saturn is not due to gravitational contraction, the equations are not valid for Saturn. What I mean to say is the equations are valid for those planets which show gravitational contraction. Am I correct? $\endgroup$ Nov 2 '20 at 3:36
  • $\begingroup$ Additionally, I have found a paper discussing about Saturn's history of gravitational contraction. What I gather from the paper is that the planet used to contract gravitationally billions of years ago which would account for the luminosity and the thermal energy. So, why did it stopped gravitationally contracting (in recent times, luminosity and internal heat energy is due to chemical differentiation of atmosphere and falling of helium)? $\endgroup$ Nov 2 '20 at 3:52
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Because of what I've said in my answer @NilayGhosh $\endgroup$
    – ProfRob
    Nov 2 '20 at 7:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.