-5
$\begingroup$

I have been wondering this and the teachers at my high school never really gave me an answer. Please help, why was Pluto kicked out of the solar system?

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Normally, you should wait 24 hours before accepting an answer so you can receive perhaps better answers and get more feedback on your current answers. $\endgroup$ – fasterthanlight Jan 31 at 18:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Downvoted for early acceptance of a bad answer. $\endgroup$ – David Hammen Jan 31 at 18:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ And why are we still debating this? Voting to close as off topic. $\endgroup$ – David Hammen Jan 31 at 18:56
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ I’m voting to close this question because questions about the planet status of Pluto are old, and are now explicitly off-topic. $\endgroup$ – David Hammen Jan 31 at 18:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Please see this meta post concerning this topic of discussion, as @DavidHammen said. $\endgroup$ – fasterthanlight Jan 31 at 19:25
3
$\begingroup$

Clyde William Tombaugh discovered Pluto in 1930. He saw that it is pretty big, so he gave him the classification of planet. But then the scientists discovered more objects, sometimes even bigger than Pluto. If they would classify all of them for the planets, then we would have around 20 or 30 of them. But that wouldn't be so great. So they just decided, that Pluto is too small. In fact, Ganymede, Titan, Callisto, Io, Moon, Europa, Triton are all larger than Pluto (they are moons). Eris is just some kilometers smaller than Pluto.

But the main thing here regards the IAU definition of the planet. Planet must clear its neighbourhood, but Pluto clearly hasn't done it.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, well i always thought it was because of what Joseph Casey said, As it just got too far away from the system but yes that would work too. $\endgroup$ – TheBigJoe1489 Jan 31 at 17:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ProfRob Size is the issue. $\endgroup$ – David Hammen Jan 31 at 18:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DavidHammen Maybe you could explain your comment to help others who have read the IAU definition and can't see how size (or even mass, since Pluto is spherical) comes into it. $\endgroup$ – ProfRob Jan 31 at 21:36
  • $\begingroup$ @ProfRob See this answer by Emilio Pisanty. $\endgroup$ – David Hammen Feb 1 at 8:28
  • $\begingroup$ That answer says "Size, for example, is not a good discriminant, because solar system bodies come in a continuum of sizes from Jupiter down to meter-long asteroids. ". It then goes on to talk about a dimensionless mass ratio which is just a proxy for rule #3 in the IAU definition. @DavidHammen . Size is not relevant $\endgroup$ – ProfRob Feb 1 at 8:53

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.