I realize that the collision explanation is in any case highly (purely?) speculative, but I'm curious how it would work. If Uranus is a ball of gas, why wouldn't any colliding object just pass through (or perhaps be destroyed/significantly damaged by the heat of friction)? What would there be for the colliding object to hit? Did Uranus have a significant solid mass at one time? Is this a function of the speeds that would have been involved (sort of akin to skipping rocks on a pond, if that's a relevant analogy)?

  • 11
    $\begingroup$ "If Uranus is a ball of gas" It's not. $\endgroup$ – curiousdannii Feb 28 at 12:03
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the clarification! $\endgroup$ – Kurt Weber Mar 1 at 13:23

For objects on the scale of a planet, the state of matter doesn't really matter much. A colliding planet or planetesimal would not "just pass through" The amount and density of the gas would prevent that.

Some easy experiments: Put your hand outside a car as you are driving along, you'll feel that "gas" (ie air) has real substance and pushes against your hand quite hard. Now imagine that you are driving at 20 km/s.... What happens when a piece of rock from space hits the atmosphere? It doesn't just pass through, it burns up in the air as a meteor.

Moreover the pressure and density in Uranus is huge. Not so far below the surface are layers of water,ice, ammonia, methane. And the pressure is so great that the density is more that that of water.

The collision of two gas planets could result in a combined planet that had a rotation axis inclinded at 90 degrees or more, and tidal effects and equatorial bulge effects would pull the moons into orbits around the equator.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I don't quite see how this answers the OP. They asked "How is it possible ..." This answer essentially says "It could be possible". It's possible because of the gyroscope effect, where applying an off-center force to a spinning body causes it's rotational axis to change according to right hand rule. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyroscope $\endgroup$ – andy256 Mar 1 at 5:17
  • $\begingroup$ @andy256 That part I get, actually. Maybe I could have worded my question (which I think James answered fairly understandably) better, but my confusion/lack of understanding was related specifically to the not-solid part of it. $\endgroup$ – Kurt Weber Mar 1 at 13:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @andy256 It's answering the "why doesn't it just pass through" part of the question. $\endgroup$ – Barmar Mar 1 at 16:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.