5
$\begingroup$

Historically astronomy has been the regime of visible light, looking at distant objects in the visible spectrum and later taking photographs in the visible spectrum.

In the past century radio astronomy, infrared astronomy and exploring other bands in the electromagnetic spectrum became feasible.

Over the past decade we have been able to begin doing neutrino astronomy, identifying distant neutrino sources.

Is there any reason that this cannot progress to other particles, I.E. general cosmic ray astronomy?

One could consider a specialized telescope (it would need to be in a satellite) that detects muons only and forms images from muon detection, or perhaps a proton telescope. The idea being to map incoming particles to pixels in an image, and assign a brightness depending on frequency of particles.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ We actually started doing neutrino astronomy back in the 1960s, though for a long time it was just observing solar neutrinos. (Though neutrinos from Supernova 1987A were detected.) $\endgroup$ – Peter Erwin Apr 23 at 20:03
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic-ray_observatory $\endgroup$ – Peter Erwin Apr 23 at 20:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There are many different types of cosmic ray observatories on earth (e.g. Cherenkov telescopes, neutrino detectors etc) and also space-based experiments like the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS-02) on the ISS to conduct cosmic ray astronomy. $\endgroup$ – Benny Apr 23 at 22:02
  • $\begingroup$ There's a nicely titled post "Scientists confirm existence of moon" preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2013/11/19/… On detecting the shadow of the moon in cosmic rays (or rather in the shower of muons from cosmic rays) $\endgroup$ – James K Apr 24 at 8:07
  • $\begingroup$ Quanta Magazine has a nice popular overview quantamagazine.org/… dealing with ultrahigh energy rays and a recent paper on their sources, arxiv.org/abs/2101.04564 $\endgroup$ – Anders Sandberg Apr 28 at 14:35
4
$\begingroup$

Yes, cosmic-ray astronomy is a thing, and it has been for a while.

More generally, there is multi-messenger astronomy since there are now multiple windows through which we are able to observe the universe via direct observation:

  1. electromagnetic (i.e., light rays, photons)
  2. neutrino
  3. cosmic rays (i.e. high-energy protons and atomic nuclei moving at relativistic speeds)
  4. gravitational radiation

Naturally, we built telescopes for observing light first. Galileo used an optical telescope and it turned out to be very fruitful for him, and it took off from there. Lens crafting became an art that was intimately tied with the progress of astronomy until the 20th century, where the discovery of quantum mechanics opened up the world of particle physics. Neutrinos sourced from nuclear reactions in the Sun, processes elsewhere in the Milky Way, and in other galaxies arrive at Earth and have been detected since the 1960s (although a large fraction of extra-galactic neutrinos are generated in supernovae, it is interesting to note that geoneutrinos are sourced from the decay of radionuclides in the Earth's interior, which helped to confirm the radiogenic theory of Earth's heating).

Over the past decade we have been able to begin doing neutrino astronomy, identifying distant neutrino sources. Is there any reason that this cannot progress to other particles, I.E. general cosmic-ray astronomy?

There are numerous detectors all over the world designed to detect cosmic rays. There are direct (involving balloons or satellites in the atmosphere making measurements) and indirect (involving ground-based detectors searching for the shower of particles that cascade from the decay of cosmic rays in the atmosphere or searching for photons that are created from that cascade moving through the atmosphere) detection methods. I am generalizing, there are other methods and it is an active area of research (as Benny listed many examples in their comment).

For example, muons were originally discovered in cosmic rays shortly after antimatter was discovered. Muon detectors are of many types (i.e. Cherenkov-radiation water-tank detector) and can be used for all kinds of interesting purposes. For example, exploring the insides of pyramids and volcanoes without people getting hurt.

The recent direct detections of gravitational radiation by the LIGO/Virgo collaboration reveals that parts of the Universe we used to think we closed-off from observation are now see-able (or may soon be), for examples, at the early Universe prior to the cosmic-microwave-background radiation, and inside of compact objects such as white dwarves and neutron stars.

There could be other undiscovered windows into the Universe, for instance, if there is a "dark force" and thus a "dark photon" associated with dark matter, but that is speculative. We generally need reasons to suspect that something exists before we start making detectors to see them, but the early bird can get the worm, or sometimes it doesn't (like Joseph Weber!!).

Before the advent of large particle accelerators, i.e. 1950s, particle physicists relied on cosmic ray observations. These large accelerators, like at Fermilab or the LHC, are built to discover particles, and they have had varied success which also helped in the development of modern cosmic-ray detections that you could consider as being "general cosmic ray telescopes."

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.