2
$\begingroup$

I'm beyond an amateur, but I've been failing to find this information and it makes me think I'm missing something.

Anyway: I am trying to write a procedurally generated simulation that includes different stars of different types. I want to be able to describe their output in different wavelengths, from radio to gamma rays. It doesn't need to be perfect or precise, I just want to have a vector for about how much of their energy is released as radio waves, infared, etc. I want to be able to make rough estimates of how much radiation of different types planets at different distances would be subject to. It would be great to also have some notion of the frequency and intensity of events like sunspots or flares.

That seemed like an easy enough question, but I've been unable to find the information even for the sun, let alone a "typical" range for a star. (So far I've found one image that graphs sunlight, but only in the IR-UV range and it would be tough to translate to a vector.) I can find a lot of claims that such-and-such sort of star emits a lot of so-and-so radiation, but not hard numbers.

For my purposes specific (narrow) spectral lines aren't important.

So,

  1. Am I thinking about this completely wrong? Is there a reason I can't quantify light in this way?
  2. Does anyone know where I could find this information? Ideally a chart of proportional energy in each range for each star type, but anything I could build that from would be good.
  3. How can I relate "normal" energy output to specific events like flares?
New contributor
Edward Peters is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

A friend of mine may have answered this for me: he said to basically assume stars act as black body radiators, in which case I can find what I want from Planck's law and some calculus.

New contributor
Edward Peters is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ This works ok for wavelengths between about 400nm-10,000 nm. Outside this range it will be very poor, and a huge underestimate for UV and X-ray radiation, which depend on more than just the type of the star. $\endgroup$ – ProfRob Jul 22 at 21:21
  • $\begingroup$ @ProfRob do you know a more accurate way to find those values? $\endgroup$ – Edward Peters Jul 22 at 22:15

Your Answer

Edward Peters is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.