2
$\begingroup$

Observation

This video by In a Nutshell visualises the V723 Mon orbiting a smaller and heavier object/black hole named Unicorn. However, the animation shows Unicorn and V723 both orbiting some common orbital centre at approximately the same angular velocity (rad/s).

Orbital pattern of V723 Mon and Unicorn in Kurzgesagt video.

Doubt

However, intuitively I would expect the Unicorn (or V723 Mon for that matter) to be at the other side of the orbital centre of the two bodies, as visualised in this animation:

https://u.osu.edu/tharinduj/files/2021/04/ASAS-SN-Black-Hole-1.mp4

Hypothesis

Explanations could perhaps be that:

  • both Unicorn and V723 Mon both orbit a larger body, which is at the centre of the Kurzgesagt animation.
  • There is an object that influences the orbit of Unicorn even more than V723 Mon causing the barycenter of Unicorn and that other object to be at the actual centre showed in the Kurzgesagt video.

Yet those seem unlikely, and especially given the other animation I found of Unicorn and V723 Mon, it seems like the In A Nutshell video simply has a slightly inaccurate visualisation.

Question

Hence, I would like to ask:

Is the relative position w.r.t. the implied orbital centre of the two bodies in the In A Nutshell animation an accurate representation (or would it be improved by visualising Unicorn (or V723 Mon) on the other side of the implied orbital centre)?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Just looks incorrect. The signal to noise ratio of these videos is pretty high though compared with most popular stuff. $\endgroup$
    – ProfRob
    Commented Aug 24, 2021 at 15:17
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The ArXiV link says that 'The simplest explanation for the massive companion is a single compact object, most likely a black hole in the "mass gap".' That is, we currently believe that it's a binary system, and so that's what the In A Nutshell video should illustrate. In a binary orbit, the COM (centre of mass) of the system must lie on the line connecting the COMs of the two bodies (and of course it must be between the two bodies). $\endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Commented Aug 25, 2021 at 4:37

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .