0
$\begingroup$

Wikipedia's NEOSTEL says:

The Near Earth Object Survey TELescope (NEOSTEL - also known as "Flyeye") is an astronomical survey and early-warning system for detecting near-Earth objects sized 40 metres (130 feet) and above a few weeks before they impact Earth.

and

The fly eye aspect of the telescope refers to the use of compound optics, as opposed to the single set of optics used in a conventional telescope. Classically, telescopes were designed around a single human observer looking through an eye piece. Astrographs were developed in the 19th century where a photographic plate, or later a CCD, records the image, which a human observer can then view. With the human eye no longer directly observing the image there is no longer a restriction on a single viewing point, and asteroid detection software has become fully automated, so a human observer need not view the majority of images at all.

Light enters the NEOSTEL telescope through the aperture and is reflected off the primary mirror onto a secondary, consisting of 16 mirrors arranged on a hexadecagonal pyramid. The split beam then passes into 16 separate aspheric lenses and on to 16 corresponding CCD image sensors. NEOSTEL uses the 16 CCD cameras to view 45 square degrees of light entering the telescope aperture. The pixel scale is 1.5 arc seconds per pixel across the whole field of view.

Question:

I understand the nontraditional secondary is multifaceted but its been hard for me to find details on the optical design. Are these beam splitters very close to the primary focus so that they cut up the field of view fairly cleanly, or are they far from the focus so that there's quite a lot of overlap and sharing of field between adjacently viewing cameras?

Are the faces flat or curved? What shape are they (e.g. rectangular, hexagonal, etc.)

And just how aspheric are each of the lenses used to correct individual fields? They must be pretty unusually shaped!


Potentially helpful but paywalled:


From The Fly-Eye Telescope, Development and First Factory Tests Results Proc. 1st NEO and Debris Detection Conference, Darmstadt, Germany, 22-24 January 2019, published by the ESA Space Safety Programme Office Ed. T. Flohrer, R. Jehn, F. Schmitz (http://neo-sst-conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int, January 2019):

Figure 3. NEOSTEL Opto-mechanical assembly Figure 4. Fly Eye optical architecture concept

click figures for full size

Screenshots from the ESA video "Asteroid Day: GV'S ESA'S FlyEye Telescope, OHBITALIA, Milan, Italy" Screenshots from the ESA video "Asteroid Day: GV'S ESA'S FlyEye Telescope, OHBITALIA, Milan, Italy"

Screenshots from the ESA video Asteroid Day: GV'S ESA'S FlyEye Telescope, OHBITALIA, Milan, Italy found here. Click figures for full size

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Good question. I found this video from ESA about the telescope which gives some interesting shots, but, after some digging, I couldn't find anything useful in terms of actual details that wasn't resolutely behind a paywall. This may be a tricky one to answer, unless someone has access to get behind the paywall. $\endgroup$
    – zephyr
    Commented Oct 6, 2021 at 18:21
  • $\begingroup$ @zephyr thanks! Most days I'll have a chance to do so. I can take a look but won't answer my own question for a while in case someone else wants to. I think it's going to be an interesting looking secondary array! $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Oct 6, 2021 at 19:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This probably doesn't add much, and doesn't answer your main question really, but the faces are flat. Consider the faces of a traditional four sided pyramid. Then imagine you cut the four corners off to form an octagon - now you have 8 flat faces, 16 when you cut those 8 corners off. I admit the word facet is a bit of a problem, because it means both the flat faces of e.g. a pyramid, but also means the parts of a compound eye, which are not flat of course. If you happen to find the answer to your question, please feel free to update the Wikipedia article (remembering to cite your sources). $\endgroup$
    – Raffles
    Commented Jan 29, 2022 at 10:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Raffles I'm kinda slow, it's taken me more than half a decade to get used to Stack Exchange, I don't think I'll ever venture into the world of Wikipedia editing. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Jan 29, 2022 at 11:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Raffles okay that's great! Thank you. $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Commented Jan 29, 2022 at 11:59

0

You must log in to answer this question.