0
$\begingroup$

I have heard a lot about Betelgeuse exploding in 2022. But, I had a doubt about this. Astronomers are still receiving signals from Betelgeuse. And if Betelgeuse is going to explode in 2022, then wouldn't we see the exploding of Betelgeuse in the night sky, 642 years later? Has Betelgeuse already exploded? If it has, how are astronomers able to still receive signals from Betelgeuse?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ "I have heard a lot about Betelgeuse exploding in 2022" -- Have you?? I haven't. Please tell us exactly where you heard this. You can include a link, if possible. $\endgroup$
    – James K
    Nov 17 '21 at 19:42
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ For what its worth, the chance of Betelgeuse going supernova in 2022 is about 1 in 500000. Any website that claims it is likely to explode in 2022 is lying to get you to click on adverts. $\endgroup$
    – James K
    Nov 17 '21 at 22:27
7
$\begingroup$

Light travels at a finite speed, 299 792 458 meters per second. Hence the term light year is the distance it takes light to travel in one year.

Most of what is observed in the cosmos occurred some time ago. The more distant an object is the longer it has taken for the light from that object to reach our location.

If Betelgeuse has exploded we don't know about it yet. Betelgeuse is 724 light years away. If it is going to explode in 2022, we won't see it until 2746 CE. If we do see it explode in 2022, the explosion occurred in 1298 CE

$\endgroup$
1
5
$\begingroup$

Has Beteleguse exploded? No, as we have not seen the explosion.

From the reference frame of the Earth we have not seen it explode (yet). It does not matter that in Betelgeuse's frame it may have exploded already. When people discuss what happens to any object in the Universe we are always talking about what we have seen on Earth. Just because it takes a long time for us to receive the signal is irrelevant, all that matters is what we have seen.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Has Beteleguse exploded? No, as we have not seen the explosion. You sure this sentence is accurate? It could have already exploded, but we haven't seen it yet. As far as I know "the reference frame of the Earth" isn't usually taken to mean "an observer on Earth" either - reference frames cover the entire universe, once defined. $\endgroup$
    – Allure
    Nov 19 '21 at 0:24
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Yes it is accurate, we can not see nor determine what has happened to any object outside of our light cone. As the information from Betelgeuse exploding has not reached us yet, then as far as we on Earth are concerned is has not happened. Worrying about events outside our light cone is what leads to the OP's confusion in the first place (as well as probably some badly written popular science webpage). $\endgroup$
    – Rob
    Nov 19 '21 at 9:23
-1
$\begingroup$

All this recent Betelgeuse hype is artificially inflated, we have absolutely no way of predicting the timeline with such accuracy and resolution. It is just the tabloids' way of exploiting the topic that allows for perpetual hype. The tabloids you are talking about, saying it's exploding in 2022, probably intend to mean that the event of its explosion will supposedly be visible from Earth in 2022, not that the actual explosion itself will occur in 2022 (with the exercise left to reader to find out that the explosion will already have occurred hundreds of years ago if it is to be visible from Earth in 2022).

If nothing changes from our perspective in 100 years, the lowest quality tabloids from 2121 will still be exploiting this subject with overinflated hype and tell you that Betelgeuse's explosion will supposedly be visible from Earth in 2122.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Do you have anything to cite where you got your information? $\endgroup$ Nov 22 '21 at 16:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @fasterthanlight There is no source for such precise information about the timeline of events for such distant celestial bodies as Betelguese, so there is no source I could cite, that's the point of my post. $\endgroup$ Nov 22 '21 at 20:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.