I am interested in how an infalling observer perceives the plunge into a black hole. Let me assume that actually we have three spaceships: C being at a constant distance to the event horizon, and A and B in a free fall into the back hole, A being a short distance closer to it and B following behind. Let me also assume that the black hole is supermassive, so that A and B will have enough proper time left to do some analysis before being ripped apart by tidal forces (Even if sadly we will never be able to read their paper).
It is well known that from the point of view of C, A and B will never cross the event horizon as time dilation approaches infinity. But how do things look for A and B?
If A and B are close to each other, then the dilation of A's proper time, measured by B, will be less than what is measured by C. Seen from B, A will also never cross the event horizon, but get closer to it similar to what C sees. For an infalling observer like A, the event horizon seems to recede, so both will approach the singularity with increasing acceleration (and tidal forces will draw them apart), but nor will B see A cross, and neither will A experience crossing it.
So my assumptions are:
- an infalling observer B who is following another infalling observer A will see that their distance becomes larger, and A will approach the event horizon but will never cross it.
- an infalling observer will (according to his own perception) never cross the event horizon either (of course, he will eventually be ripped apart by the increasing tidal forces).
My question is whether these assumptions are correct?