4
$\begingroup$

Simple question. Can a crater, theoretically, form inside another crater? Say if a very large one just happened to, by sheer cosmic coincidence, had another smaller meteorite fall inside and impact hard enough to form a smaller crater inside of the crater? Say, half a kilometre inside of a two kilometre large crater?

I am no astronomer by any means, I was just immensely curious if this can actually happen, and if so, how it would work.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ The Wikipedia page on lunar craters has an image of craters within craters as well as the statement The age of large craters is determined by the number of smaller craters contained within it. So I'm tempted to downvote for lack of research. $\endgroup$
    – Wyck
    Commented May 27 at 17:21
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Wyck I'm new to astronomy, friend. How am I to know the way if I have no map? You have given me the map now, and I know where to look. $\endgroup$
    – Rory 02
    Commented May 28 at 9:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What makes you believe that it couldn't? This is one of those questions that only really makes sense if rooted in an idea that a crater's surface is fundamentally different from the rest of the planet/moon's surface, and it begs investigating where that idea would've come from. $\endgroup$
    – Flater
    Commented May 29 at 1:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Flater I am not a smart man. $\endgroup$
    – Rory 02
    Commented May 29 at 18:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Rory02 yes you are $\endgroup$
    – Astrovis
    Commented May 30 at 19:54

5 Answers 5

21
$\begingroup$

Yes, craters can overlap, and they do overlap.

The exact theory of the origin of the Moon is still debated, but from the understanding of the Lunar geologic timescale we can see that it's been there, getting hit for at least 4 billion years. That's plenty of time for craters to being overlapping each other in large numbers.

The ejecta of newer impacts make the contours of the older ones less clear. In fact, crater counting, with attention to the frequency of overlapping craters is actually used to determine the age of a surface, of how long it has been exposed to impacts.

$\endgroup$
20
$\begingroup$

Yes, of course. Lunar surface is filled with overlapping craters. See Vendelinus for example. The relative ages of the craters can be determined by the amount of secondary craters per unit area which overlap on a primary crater. A theoretical study has been made on this. See: Overlapping Lunar Craters by M.S. Podanoffsky, Strolling Astronomer, vol. 20, no. 5–6, 1967 (link)

Even in asteroids, overlapping craters has been observed. Example - Ceres, Vesta

Also see - How overlapping craters are formed?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Aye, thank you for the resource. Have a good day! $\endgroup$
    – Rory 02
    Commented May 26 at 20:47
11
$\begingroup$

I know the question is about impact craters, but as it's not precised in the title, and for the sake of completeness: volcanic craters do overlap too. A large eruption can create a large crater, then another, smaller eruption, can create a new, smaller crater inside the old one. There are many examples on Earth, including Santa Ana (El Salvador), Misti (Peru), and Kilimanjaro (Tanzania):

black and white aerial photograph of nested volcanic craters at the top of Kilimanjaro Aerial view of Kibo, the highest cone of Kilimanjaro, showing three nested craters. Photo by Walter Mittelholzer, public domain.

They are called "nested craters" if you want to look for more. On other planets, a famous example is the nested calderas—a type of volcanic crater—of Olympus Mons, the tallest volcano on Mars, with as many as six overlapping structures identified:

perspective view of the caldera complex of Olympus Mons volcano This perspective view shows the complex caldera at the summit of Olympus Mons on Mars. CC BY-SA IGO 3.0 ESA/DLR/FU Berlin.

$\endgroup$
5
1
$\begingroup$

The question is well answered, but here is what has become a classic case in the Martian system. The large (9 km diameter) Stickney crater on the moon Phobos was hit more recently, producing the more sharply defined Limtoc Crater.

enter image description here

From NASA

$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

Things are not only so, but it is actually an example in math introduction textbooks about the fractals. Fractals are mathematical structures looking similarly in big and small. They have a lot of interesting properties.

Fun thing is that if you only have a photo, it is surprisingly hard to say if it is 10cm or 1000km. Because it looks the same. Some big craters, with more smaller craters over it, and yet more yet smaller craters. Making a picture of the Moon from the Earth with a telescope, or making a picture from 1m height from a probe, it looks the same.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Two months later, and I still do not know what this means. $\endgroup$
    – Rory 02
    Commented Jul 19 at 10:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Rory02 Google for fractals. The essence is, if you have a photo from the Moon surface, you have no way to know if it is 1mm or 100km wide, they look the same. $\endgroup$
    – peterh
    Commented Jul 25 at 18:15
  • $\begingroup$ You have brought an unrelated concept into a discussion regarding substantial celestial effects on geography. I am not speaking about pictures. I am speaking of real, walkable craters. This is unrelated unless I were taking out a random picture and asking. I appreciate your comment, but it is simply unrelated. I apologise. $\endgroup$
    – Rory 02
    Commented Jul 26 at 19:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Rory02 No, it is very well related, i.e. craters are so deeply embedded into each other in the Moon, that it is a school example of fractals in the nature. I would happily dig out very interesting links about it, but first I would need to see that you would understand them. $\endgroup$
    – peterh
    Commented Jul 27 at 11:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .