1
$\begingroup$

According to Wikipedia and a few other trustable sources, the current Julian Period started in 4713 BCE and will end in 3268 CE. I remember seeing an online document (though maybe it was a scan of a printed document?) which used an initial 9 for all Julian day numbers before 4713 BCE. I presume it also used a way to differentiate dates after 3268 CE.

So my question, in line with Is there a maximum Julian day?, is: What will happen at the end of the current Julian Period? Will we start numbering Julian days at 1? I mean, in theory, we should, as it will be a new Julian Period…

(Accessorily, if someone knows about the document I mentioned above, that used a 9 for pre-4713BCE dates, it would be appreciated.)

$\endgroup$
6
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ No, the Julian Days astronomers use is strictly a count of days since 4713. There are already data sets that cover large intervals where this would come in to play (e.g. JPL's Development Ephemeris) and they do not make any special cases for a new Julian Period. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 10 at 23:39
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you @GregMiller. For some reason, I never thought of looking at JPL data. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 11 at 8:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How could you even prefix a number by a 9? How do you know whether 990 is negative 90 or positive 990? $\endgroup$
    – asdfex
    Commented Jul 12 at 12:32
  • $\begingroup$ @asdfex: I wholeheartedly agree with you. I found this extremely weird when I saw that publication, and it took me a while to figure out that they meant the previous Julian Period, as it was not mentioned explicitly in the text. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 12 at 13:17
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I suspect the 9 prefix notation is related to the old way of handling negative numbers back in the day when we used log tables. See math.stackexchange.com/q/719616/207316 $\endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Commented Jul 12 at 15:25

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .