5
$\begingroup$

I am creating a virtual solar system model and I want it to be as realistic as possible (e.g. orbits are ellipses, not circles, and orbits are oriented correctly, not all coplanar). In order for me to do this, I need to know the eccentricity of the orbit, the perihelion, the semi-major-axis, inclination and azimuth. I have all of this information, except for the azimuth of the orbit, which is the angle from the sun to the aphelion. Are there any reliable sources with this information?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_elements $\endgroup$ – rnrneverdies Nov 18 '14 at 2:53
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please give a better definition of azimuthal angle in this case? Even better, would be if you would use the right terminology, according to the page linked by the OP above. $\endgroup$ – Py-ser Nov 18 '14 at 8:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As noted in the wikipedia article, one needs seven parameters to specify an orbit, the epoch time plus a set of six values that represent the orbit at that point in time. The canonical set is $a$, $e$, $i$, $\Omega$, $\omega$, $M_0$, and $t_0$ (semi-major axis, eccentricity, inclination, right ascension of ascending node, argument of perigee, mean anomaly, and epoch time). Vinnie Caprarola, you only list five parameters in your question. $\endgroup$ – David Hammen Nov 18 '14 at 9:31
  • $\begingroup$ Are you creating a static model or a dynamic model where the planets actually move over time? If dynamic, you'll want to use SPICE files for uber-accuracy. Are you modeling planetary moons as well? $\endgroup$ – barrycarter Nov 19 '14 at 13:17
1
$\begingroup$

As someone commented, you are actually short a term for fully defining the orbit. The "azimuth" as you describe is commonly defined as a "longitude of perihelion", and you're forgetting the orientation of the inclination, commonly defined as "longitude of the ascending node." (Both of these values are included in the first link in the previous posted answer)

For a more detailed look at the math which uses the defining values, JPL made a whitepaper which goes into the math, and also allows you to account for changes in the orbital terms. (Most of the math you're probably looking for is at the end of the document, beginning about section 8.10, on page 25)

ftp://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/pub/eph/planets/ioms/ExplSupplChap8.pdf

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The Keplerian elements for the planets provides all of the information needed to define the orbit and where the planet is currently along it.

Approximate elements are available from JPL and can be found here: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/txt/p_elem_t1.txt

If you don't want to do the math, you can just ask JPL Horizons to do it for you and calculate an ephemeris telling you which direction each planet is in right now: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for?Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.