2
$\begingroup$

I am learning orbital elements and one thing isn't clear to me. When I look at the Horizon's ephemeris data for Mars, this gives me argument of perifocus equal to roughly 286.53 degrees on epoch J2000. When I look up its longitude of perihelion for the same epoch here, I get roughly 336.04 degrees. I thought these two parameters are the same thing. What is the difference between them? Why are the two numbers not the same?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

I know the answer now. Turns out that longitude of perihelion ($\overline\omega$) is defined as the sum of longitude of ascending node ($\Omega$) on the ecliptic plane and argument of perifocus ($\omega$) on the orbital plane: ($\Omega$ + $\omega$). It's strange to add up two non-coplanar angles, even when the inclination between the two planes is very small, but that's what it is.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.