I have looked at this issue for nearly 35 years. If the universe came into being by way of a Big Bang process we will probably never find the exact center at which it commenced:

##I. REASONS BB CENTER MAY NEVER BE FOUND 

**1.** We should always keep this in mind as our starting point: We did not see the beginning of our universe take place. There are no eyewitnesses that can tell us what actually happened. Therefore, it is a 13.7+ billions of years old **COLD** case. In other words everything we put forward regarding the beginning of the universe will always be only speculation. We have no way to prove anything that we hypothesize regarding how are universe commenced (no matter how many theories are proposed regarding the beginning of the universe nor how good they and their corresponding math equations appear to be, there is no way to fully test them to prove out anything they make claims for). In other words, even if the numbers do not add up perfectly you can always come up with another constant or sub-theory that makes it look _more_ correct, none of which is provable in our real world predicament.

**2.** That said, even if the Big Bang ia responsible for how the universe expanded to its current state, problems or barriers may prevent us from locating the exact location of the center from which it all started.

**3.** The starting point, regarding the BB, was supposedly a state of singularity. What singularity actually would be is not really known. However, its state would be a point about the size of a marble in which presumably all the laws of physics as we know them are broken down, a kind of state of total annihilation state of all atomic structure and its various particles. Supposedly, if expansion occurred there would be opaque because photons would not be present nor released during this phase. In other words, we can never see through this phase nor would there be any way to see this phase of expansion because we would need to see photons. Only where photons are released are we able to see even part of what was there (the so-called _visible universe_ limit).

**4.** Because we can not see beyond the visible universe (which would include the parts of the electromagnetic spectrum that can not be seen by the naked eye, that can only be see through equipment that detect invisible wavelengths) we would have almost no chance of ever finding the exact center of the BB.

**5.** According to one theory space expands separate from matter and energy. That is we located within and we are part of this expansion which supposedly means that space (fabric of spacetime) is expanding in all directions all around us. The result is that we can not detect a direction in which the BB started from which means we can never find the exact spot the BB commenced from. Supposedly because we are located within the BB expansion, this precludes us from having a frame of reference that would allow us to have the ability to trace back and locate the exact center of the BB.

**6.** The real world frame of reference for our universe is three dimensional plus time. The visible universe _matter_ is not uniform in all directions. That is all the galaxies, etc. are not uniformly spaced. Since, supposedly the Big Bang started with a very tiny singularity blob (at least for this theory), smaller than a marble, then there ought to be various vector trails (even if they are fragmented or somewhat askew, blurred or dissipated) of some sort going back to the marble size singularity state (especially since matter across our universe is not uniformly spaced along its x, y & z axis). However, so far we have not been able to locate any evidence that would suggest that the BB came from a particular direction which has also precluded us from locating a BB _center_.

**7.** Since matter is not uniformly distributed across the universe then there had to be other forces at work to drive their uneven distribution. There ought to be somewhere along the "edge" of the _visible_ universe signs and traces of splitting of matter and clumps of energy even if we can not see the actual center (point) of where the Big Bang originated. That is even if space can expand separate from the matter and energy it contains, having started at a point no larger than a marble, it must have vector changes at some point as matter and clumps of energy split off at uneven intervals and directions. Dispite great effort to find evidence of these events, so far we have not succeeded.

**8.** Unfortunately, two dimensional demonstations lack ability to show true three dimensional effect regarding starting at a tiny point to expansion of 13.7 billion light years (especially since it is in fact spherical that started at a tiny point). In other words, if we look across _through_ our universe **sphere** (not a two dimensional plane) somewhere at least near the edge of our visible universe we should see at least some large area where galaxies are much closer together compared to say an eight or ten billion light years area around where our galaxy is located now (certainly if the universe had a tiny starting point there has to be a visible change somewhere in an expansion covering a huge area of more than 13.7 billion light years which would give us some indication in which direction we should concentrate our effort to find at least something regarding at least the general direction of BB original location).

**9.** Also, there may be a force(s) outside our universe that is the driving force for the expansion of our universe, in which case it would most likely make it impossible to ever find a center if one ever existed.