Skip to main content

New answers tagged

1 vote

Why would surface flux include radiation pointing inward the target?

You are not integrating the flux in all directions as indicated in your sketch. The integration is summing up the contributions over all (visible) latitudes and longitudes to the flux in a particular ...
ProfRob's user avatar
  • 162k
0 votes

Vectorized definition of flux yields counter-intuitive result

If the specific intensity is isotropic, then indeed the net flux through a surface is zero. I am not sure what you mean by a perfectly radiating source, but the radiation field say at the photosphere ...
ProfRob's user avatar
  • 162k
1 vote

Surface flux in a specific direction: why is specific intensity in other directions allowed to contribute?

Flux, in terms of power per unit area is in general direction-dependent, unless the radiation is isotropic. For example, the power emitted by a dipole is zero along its axis and at a maximum for a ...
ProfRob's user avatar
  • 162k

Top 50 recent answers are included