Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 19, 2020 at 16:25 answer added ProfRob timeline score: 2
Aug 19, 2020 at 15:41 answer added Tobychev timeline score: 1
Jun 1, 2020 at 13:28 comment added Agile_Eagle Yes, I think this is the modern consensus
Aug 19, 2019 at 15:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAstronomy/status/1163465791653720064
Apr 8, 2019 at 8:44 comment added MichaelB76 I believe Quasars are far more luminous than typical AGNs as they are accreting material at a far higher rate, so if the Circinus galaxy was aligned with us it wouldn't be classified as a Quasar. However, Quasar isn't a precisely defined term.
Apr 7, 2019 at 10:54 history edited Agerhell CC BY-SA 4.0
Mainly added a wish for someone pointing to an investigation "proving" that galaxies perceived to host quasars alway fall within a certaion observation angle range
Apr 7, 2019 at 10:30 comment added Agerhell I did read that question before I posted. Note that someone answered about quasars "Its main property is that it's galaxy axis points towards the earth and this way we receive its light and radio signals. That's why they are one of the most energetic AGN. " There is no source to back up that statement provided there either. Have there been an investigation that galaxies perceived to host quasars always are observed from a particular range of angles?
Apr 6, 2019 at 15:20 review Close votes
Apr 7, 2019 at 23:29
Apr 6, 2019 at 15:00 comment added user24157 Possible duplicate of Difference between quasar and Active Galactic Nuclei?
S Apr 6, 2019 at 6:20 history suggested Chappo Hasn't Forgotten CC BY-SA 4.0
Improved orthography and formatting; added links
Apr 5, 2019 at 23:02 review Suggested edits
S Apr 6, 2019 at 6:20
Apr 5, 2019 at 21:32 history asked Agerhell CC BY-SA 4.0