1
$\begingroup$

I have a fits file of the galaxy m87 produced by SCUBA 2 and I am wondering how I obtain the fluxes at 450 and 850 microns. the output image gives pixel magnitudes in mJy/beam where I want to find eh flux for a certain part of the galaxy. I am as far as summit the values of all pixels within an aperture but I am not sure where to go from there to obtain the flux as there are more than one pixel within the FWHM. say I have a an aperture of radius 1.5 pixels that gives a sum of 6985.04885203 mJy/beam with a pixel size of 3.99999999 arc seconds and a beam size of 13 arc seconds how do I obtain the flux for that aperture at that wavelength?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are you looking for flux in $\frac{photons}{m^2-Hz}$ ? Also, it's not clear what "beam" is here. Do you have the flux per spectral bandwidth in each pixel? The point is: we could all go look up exactdly how SCUBA2 works, but it's friendlier if you provide the information so we know exactly what database you are working with. $\endgroup$ – Carl Witthoft Dec 7 '16 at 13:17
1
$\begingroup$

In essence read of the peak flux value and if a point source this will be the same as your integrated flux.

to elaborate on this:

In this question your source appears to be comparable to your beam. so I would treat as a point source. - note you might also want to consider that many people apply a "match filter" to their data if dealing with faint point source emission - this smooths the map - increasing the effective beam size within the map and also there may be some flux loss (see for example: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/bib_query?arXiv:1707.00990)

You will see this (mJy/beam to mJy) is also discussed here: http://www.eaobservatory.org/jcmt/help/

For a real point source, a peak brightness value reported in units of mJy is the same as a peak brightness value reported in mJy/beam.

But what happens if we have a map in mJy/beam and we want to obtain an integrated intensity value, a total flux value? We first sum up a number of pixels and now we want to get our units correct from mJy/beam to mJy…

Total Flux = flux summed over a number of pixels/(number of pixels in a beam)

Then your units are:

[mJy*pixels/beam] / [pixels/beam] = [mJy].

Now we know that For a Gaussian:

Beam Area = 2 × π × σ² [arcsec]

where the σ of the Gaussian beam can be calculated from the JCMT FWHM values at 850 and 450 microns (reminder the beam components are provided in Dempsey’s 2013 paper).

FWHM = 2 σ √(2 ln 2) [arcsec]

So we can use the FWHM to obtain σ to calculate the Beam Area and report the beam area in terms of pixels:

number of pixels in a beam = Beam Area [arcsec] / (pixel length)²

Finally I should add you will also want to do an aperture correction - see Dempsey et al 2013's calibration paper if you are using an aperture of a different size than 60".

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.