3
$\begingroup$

For example, if I throw two planets to orbit a star at random direction, would they form an orbital resonance?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Partially the answer is no. With 2 planets and a star (3 bodies), collision is a possible outcome and gravitational acceleration of one planet kicking the other out of the system or into the star are also possible outcomes. So certainly some of the time, the outcome wouldn't be orbital resonance, but that said, I think it's a great question, if we assume none of the above scenarios happen. $\endgroup$
    – userLTK
    Oct 26 '15 at 8:31
1
$\begingroup$

If the question is "if I throw two planets to orbit a star at random direction, would they form an orbital resonance?" -- then in general, no. A resonance is an integral ratio (1/1, 2/1, 3/5, etc.) between the periods of motion of objects -- i.e., the ratio of their periods forms a rational number. Formally speaking the odds of getting a integral ratio (let alone a strong, low-order ratio, since those are the dynamically interesting ones) if you set the system up "randomly" should be infinitesimal, because irrational numbers are (infinitely) more abundant that rationals.

However, if the orbits of one or both of the planets can change over time, then the ratio between their periods changes, and they can end up in a resonance. (Which is maybe answering the title question.) How often this happens depends on whether the planets happen to start near a strong resonance, and on how rapidly the orbits change. (If the orbit of a planet changes slowly, then it won't encounter new resonances very often; on the other hand, rapid orbital change can overwhelm the effect of weak resonances, so that the planet passes through the resonance without being caught.)

For example, it's thought that Neptune and Pluto were originally not in resonance; but the gradual outward migrations of Neptune (due to various gravitational encounters between planetesimals and the giant planets) changed its orbital period and meant that eventually it reached 2/3 resonance with Pluto, and Pluto was "captured" by the resonance, after which it stayed in resonance with Neptune.

The vast majority of objects in the Solar System are not in resonance with anything else, which is perhaps another way of answering your question. (I.e., in practice it doesn't happen very often.)

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ A significant number of Kuiper belt objects are in resonance with Neptune. most of those in resonance are trans-Neptunian. And a large number asteroids around Jupiter are in resonance with Jupiter, mostly trojans or Hildas (Cis-Jovian objects). It may be a matter of size, if you have one large planet and one much smaller planetoid/asteroid, then resonance seems fairly often or perhaps resonance may simply be what's left over when the majority of the objects has either crashed or been flung out of orbit. It seems that there's a force that creates resonance with 1 big and 1 small. $\endgroup$
    – userLTK
    Oct 28 '15 at 20:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm pretty sure the resonant asteroids (Trojans) are outnumbered by the non-resonant asteroids, though. And my impression is that the classical Kuiper Belt objects (which are farther away and harder to detect) outnumber the Neptune-resonant objects. $\endgroup$ Oct 31 '15 at 16:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.