I originally went to math.stackexchange.com and they suggested I try here as well.

I'm trying to figure out how to calculate times of moonrise and moonset for a given position on the earth on a particular date. I'm using Vallado's Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications because there is an example in the book that lays out a simplified process. I'm stuck at the point where I'm trying to calculate Longitude of the ecliptic for the Moon. The formula is below where T = -0.013634497.

λEcliptic = 218.32° + 481,267.8813T + 6.29Sin(134.9 + 477,198.85T) - 1.27Sin(259.2 - 413,335.38T) + 0.66Sin(235.7 + 890,534.23T) + 0.21Sin(269.9 + 954,397.70T) - 0.19Sin(357.5 + 35,999.05T) - 0.11Sin(186.6 + 966,404.05T)

The expected answer is -0.8412457°. However, I'm unable to figure out how to get this answer. My calculations are below:

1) 218.32° + 481,267.8813T = -6343.525

2) 6.29Sin(134.9 + 477,198.85T) = 5.963779

3) -1.27Sin(259.2 - 413,335.38T) = -0.900843

4) 0.66Sin(235.7 + 890,534.23T) = -0.292285

5) 0.21Sin(269.9 + 954,397.70T) = -0.126871

6) -0.19Sin(357.5 + 35,999.05T) = 0.138211

7) -0.11Sin(186.6 + 966,404.05T) = 0.054722

Simply adding or subtracting gets me -6338.688731. How can I get the value -0.8412457° from this. My trigonometry is rusty and I'm not sure how to get the right answer. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

  • $\begingroup$ It would help a lot if you have more context. As it is now, it is hard to figure out what you are trying to accomplish. $\endgroup$ – SE - stop firing the good guys Apr 2 '16 at 11:31
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not familar with the term "longitude of the ecliptic". Do you mean the longitude of the ascending node, (or perigee?), in ecliptic coordinates? $\endgroup$ – James K Apr 2 '16 at 17:14
  • $\begingroup$ I'm using the term that came straight from the textbook. I'm assuming that Longitude of the Ecliptic refers to the time when the moon is passing the ecliptic but I don't know if it refers to the ascending node or the plane of the ecliptic for the sun. I would think it's the former but this is the term the book uses. Really all I'm trying to figure out is how to arrive at the -0.8412457° result mathematically. From the comments on math.stackexchange.com the answers I have above are correct but they imply that there is also some way to arrive at the desired term from the textbook. $\endgroup$ – ZachC Apr 2 '16 at 21:53

There's a mistake in the book (see page 280 on google books): the values for $\lambda_{ecl}$ and $\phi_{ecl}$ should be swapped. Your result is correct: $$ -6338.688^\circ\text{ mod } (360^\circ) = -218.688^\circ, $$ which is the value that is erroneously listed under $\phi_{ecl}$.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Okay, thank you. That clarifies things greatly. $\endgroup$ – ZachC Apr 5 '16 at 11:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.