According to quite recent research the observable universe contains about 2 trillion galaxies ($2 \cdot 10^{12}$). But what is counted there? Does this number also contain dwarf galaxies? According to wiki about 10 times more than normal galaxies exist. But is there a hard gap in between normal and dwarf galaxies?

To resolve all those questions does exist a chart or diagram similar to this?

Number of Stars Count
$< 10^6$ $10^{11}$
$10^6 - 10^7$ $10^{10}$
$10^7 - 10^8$ $10^{9}$
... ...

bonus question:

As far as I know we are able to see new, more distant galaxies in the next millions of years. Due to the further expansion of the universe and the acceleration there will be some point were the light of some galaxies can't reach us anymore (hubble radius) and we can see less and less galaxies again. So the number of galaxies we can see is not a constant (also some get extinct or new are created). Is there some research about the max number of galaxies we are ever able to see. Would be it much different to the 2 trillion now?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This and this previous answers calculated the number of galaxies by size in two different volumes. You could use that approach the get your answer, just using the total volume of the observable Universe instead (which is 4π/3 R³, where the radius R is roughly 46 billion lightyears). $\endgroup$ – pela Mar 22 at 22:39
  • $\begingroup$ @pela using the numbers in that link (SMC as lower bound) the result would be 1.87*10^12. That would be very close to the 2 trillion mentioned above. But is it correct? The plot has y-units of h^3 MPc^-3 but in text you are using h^-3 instead. Which one would be correct? Using h^3 would result in 1.6*10^13 galaxies greater than SMC. .....The linked plot creator also has many more interesting relations. Thank you for that as well! $\endgroup$ – J. Doe Mar 23 at 2:08
  • $\begingroup$ @J.Doe Thanks for spotting that, there was a typo. Distances are (in some cases) measured in $h^{-1}\,\mathrm{Mpc}$, in which case densities will be measured in $h^{3}\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-3}$. In the calculation I used the correct value, but the text was wrong. $\endgroup$ – pela Mar 23 at 21:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, stars come in a distribution of sizes, from roughly 0.1 to 100 Solar masses, but with a steep decrease in number with mass, such that the average is around 0.3 Solar masses (depending on the “initial mass function”, and the age of the stellar population). But stars are not the only constituents of the galaxy, there may be as much gas, and ten times as much dark matter. $\endgroup$ – pela Mar 29 at 22:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.